Short vs Standard Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta- Analysis

Authors

  • Inam Ullah Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • Muhammad Afaq Department of Radiology, Bacha Khan Medical College, Mardan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Haidar Zaman Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
  • Umair Khan Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51846/jucmd.v4i1.3079

Keywords:

Acute coronary syndrome, Coronary artery disease, New generation drug eluting stents, Dual antiplatelet therapy

Abstract

Objective: In patients with coronary artery disease, dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is recommended after percutaneous coronary
intervention, but the duration is still debated. This meta-analysis compared short-duration (1 to 3 months) to standard-time (twelve months) double antiplatelet treatment in patients who received coronary intervention with new generation drug eluting Stent.
Methodology: To conduct this examination, we methodically looked at PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Embase, and Web of Science
databases for randomized controlled trials, evaluating varying durations of double antiplatelet treatment following new generation stents implantation from July to September 2023. Seven randomized controlled trials were included with a total of 22,945 patients. The primary efficacy endpoint was the incidence of Major adverse cardiovascular events, such as cardiac mortality, heart attack, stent coagulation, and target vessel revascularization; while the safety endpoint was the incidence major bleeding. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebro-vascular complications, any bleeding, and net adverse cardiovascular incidence for a year after stent implantation.
Results: Short-time DAPT was linked to a significantly less incidence of major bleeding (0.8% vs 1.5%), any bleeding (2.5% vs 4.2%)
and NACE (2.5% vs 4.2%) compared to standard duration of DAPT. No significant variation was noticed among the two groups regarding major adverse cardiovascular events (4.1% vs. 4.2%) and acute cardiovascular and cerebrovascular incidents (4.7% vs. 4.8%). Short-duration DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome was linked with decreased risk of bleeding and net adverse cardiovascular events.
Conclusion: Short-duration DAPT significantly lowers bleeding risk and reduces net clinical adverse events without increasing ischemic risk, making it a reasonable choice for people with new-generation drug eluting stents, particularly those with high
bleeding risk or recent surgery.

Author Biographies

Muhammad Afaq, Department of Radiology, Bacha Khan Medical College, Mardan, Pakistan

 

 

Muhammad Haidar Zaman, Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

 

 

Umair Khan, Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

  translator       Double-click   Select to translate

 

 

Downloads

Published

28-10-2024

How to Cite

1.
Ullah I, Muhammad MA, Muhammad Haidar Zaman, Khan UK. Short vs Standard Duration Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with New-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents: A Meta- Analysis. J Univ Coll Med Dent. [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 28 [cited 2025 Jul. 5];4(1):78-84. Available from: https://journals.uol.edu.pk/jucmd/article/view/3079

Issue

Section

Review Articles