Algorithmic Control and Biopolitics: A Postcolonial Feminist Reading of Vikramaditya Motwane’s CTRL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71258/jctlls.v2i1.4111Keywords:
Artificial intelligence; Digital surveillance; Data colonialism; Gendered autonomy; Marginalization.Abstract
This research tends to configures the entangled role of artificial intelligence in the structurally inequivalent society where women’s autonomy is undermined through systematic violence in the third world countries. It aims to critically evaluate the marginalized sections of society with the heightened technological advancement by integrating artificial intelligence (AI), postcolonial feminism and biopolitical theory. For this purpose, the movie CTRL , directed by Vikramaditya Motwane (2024) serves as a primary text, as it centres` around a female protagonist whose narrative is directly shaped by her interaction with digital technology. Further, by employing Roberto Esposito’s biopolitical framework, the paper interrogates the implications of AI’s encroachment on human autonomy, particularly for women in postcolonial contexts. Esposito’s critique of the politicization of life is extended to consider how algorithmic decision-making may exacerbate existing gender disparities and reinforce colonial power structures. With the incorporation of feminist analyses, particularly commentary by Rafia Zakaria’s (2021) Against White Feminism: Notes on Disruption, the research underscores women’s multifaceted marginalization in postcolonial societies, being oppressed both by patriarchy and by the residual impacts of colonialism. It contends that the unchecked exploitation of AI can exacerbate inequalities, violate bodily autonomy, and further socio-political oppression. Finally, this study mandates the creation of feminist and decolonial frameworks for AI regulation, and asserts the need for critical, inclusive viewpoints in the production and deployment of new technologies.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zanib Arshad Mughal Arshad Mughal, HAJRA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Once the article review process has commenced, authors relinquish the right to withdraw or redistribute the submitted content. From that point onward, only the journal holds the authority to reject the submission.
In the event that the journal declines the manuscript after peer review, authors may then withdraw or submit the article elsewhere. However, until a formal rejection is communicated, the article remains under the exclusive review jurisdiction of the journal.
Upon publication, full copyright is held by the journal. Authors may not republish, redistribute, or modify the published content without prior written permission from the editorial board.